Star Chamber (PRO STAC8/289/30 Eliz and Francis Veer v Rich Harlakenden)

29.11.4Jas1 (Saturday 29 November 1606)

document 19204413

to the first question says that he did not know or hear illegible text one deed or three years since then Wm Edes named in the bill had any such lease in reversion to the mill Colneford Mill mentioned in the bill Plumb the 19.5.last past after his master mr Waldgrave went to the mill to view the force there did hear Wm Edes say he had a lease in reversion until which time he says he never heard of the lease