Star Chamber (PRO STAC8/289/30 Eliz and Francis Veer v Rich Harlakenden)

29.11.4Jas1 (Saturday 29 November 1606)

document 19204636

to the fourth he says that Harlakenden did not secure him or any other as he knows by bond or otherwise to save him or any of them harmless in any danger or suit at law or charge that might arise to him or to any other by keeping and taking possession of the mill neither upon any such supposed security nor did he Pennock undertake or promise to keep and get possession of the mill as much as should lie in his power to do