[an error occurred while processing this directive]

Chancery Depositions (PRO C24/504 pt 2 deposition: Lunt v Rosse)

1623 (1623)

document 18000238

nine did Robt Partridge son of the said Robt Partridge the defendant's late husband come unto the complainant Ralph and was with him by his said father's means and how long was the said son with the said Ralph and why went he away and do you not think that his said father did fully pay for all the time his said son was with the said Ralph and that the said Ralph had a great benefit thereby and was not the defendant Rose always the wife of the said Robt Partridge the father during all the time that his said son was with the plaintiff Ralph